Every panel shows a flat pre-shock trend and a post-shock divergence that does not recover.
Each panel is the headline finding of one chapter, both event studies with a flat pre-event period and a post-event divergence that does not recover.
Source: Sandoval Olascoaga (2023), Housing Dynamics in the Face of Shocks, MIT PhD Dissertation · Chapter II uses Sun & Abraham (2021) event-study on 21,174 NOAA tornado paths × CoreLogic/Redfin property transactions · Chapter III uses Cox event-time hazards on 509,694 OptumLabs enrollees (Y-axis log scale; 95% CI [1.36, 2.46] at week 12) · 95% confidence bands shown
21,174
Tornadoes (1996–2019) used as natural experiments in Chapter II
−$23,412
Drop in tornado-affected home prices by year 8, with no recovery (Chapter II)
HR 1.83
COVID-19 hazard 12 weeks after states lifted eviction moratoria (Chapter III)
Chapter II · Climate shock
The effects of localized climate shocks on places and people
Working paper · single-authored. Treats roughly 21,000 U.S. tornado paths (1996–2019, NOAA Severe Weather GIS) as exogenous treatment polygons, with a 1 km ring as control. Sun & Abraham (2021) event-study estimator with property-level fixed effects across CoreLogic and Redfin transaction data, Data Axle business records, the Stanford Educational Opportunity Project, and the FEMA Presidential Disaster Declaration Database.
What it finds. Property prices fall by $8,055 two years after the tornado and reach −$23,412 by year 8 (p = .002), with no recovery. FEMA Presidential Disaster Declarations have no statistically significant effect on sale prices. Tornado intensity (Fujita scale) doesn't matter either. A striking null. Property tax collections drop by ~$300 per property the first year and reach −$400 by year 9. School math scores fall −0.26 SD by year 9. Households are 8.8% more likely to live in a different ZIP code one year after a tornado. Small businesses (1 to 2 employees) drop −21% immediately. The "no-recovery" growth path is empirically real, and the federal aid program does not bend it.
Chapter III · Health shock
Eviction-moratoria expiration and COVID-19 infection risk
Published as Sandoval-Olascoaga, Venkataramani & Arcaya, JAMA Network Open (2021). Individual-level Cox proportional-hazards difference-in-differences in an event-time framework on 509,694 OptumLabs Data Warehouse enrollees, 43 states + DC, with the week of each state's moratorium lift as the event.
What it finds. Twelve weeks after expiration, hazard ratio reaches 1.83 (95% CI 1.36 to 2.46). The effect is strongly stratified by baseline health and neighborhood context. HR 2.36 for CCI ≥3, HR 2.31 for high-rent-burden ZIPs, HR 2.14 for high-poverty ZIPs. A null result on individuals' own ZIP-code changes argues the mechanism is community spillover, not personal eviction. This recasts eviction policy as health-equity infrastructure. Full paper page →
Chapter IV
Neighborhood change in Greater Boston
A third chapter applies the same flat-pre-event, post-event-divergence lens to long-run neighborhood change across Greater Boston, combining quasi-experimental analysis with community-based participatory research alongside the Healthy Neighborhoods Study Consortium.
Shock stabilizers should be triggered automatically and shouldn't depend on political cycles or emergency declarations to be activated. From the dissertation.
Cite this dissertation
Sandoval Olascoaga, S. (2023). Housing Dynamics in the Face of Shocks. PhD Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Urban Studies and Planning.